Cryptoeconomics

News, data and analysis on tokenized assets, market design and digital economic systems.

Regulator

United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York

The federal prosecutor's office in Manhattan, with more than 220 assistant United States attorneys and a criminal division that names financial and securities fraud, cybercrime and asset forfeiture among its work, and the office that filed the September 2026 in-rem claim to $61m of frozen USDT.

Kind Regulator
Jurisdiction United States
Stories filed 1

The profile

The office says it represents the United States and its agencies in civil and criminal litigation before the United States District Court and in proceedings before the United States Bankruptcy Court, and on appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It employs more than 220 assistant United States attorneys alongside administrative and support staff, works from 26 Federal Plaza and 86 Chambers Street in Manhattan and 50 Main Street in White Plains, and runs three divisions. The criminal division prosecutes financial and securities fraud, domestic, international and narco-terrorism, cybercrime, international and traditional organised crime, drug trafficking, public corruption, tax fraud and sex trafficking, and handles asset forfeiture. The civil division says most of its assistant United States attorneys are generalists handling affirmative and defensive matters. The White Plains division covers federal criminal violations in Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess and Sullivan counties. On this beat the office matters because Manhattan is where dollar clearing sits, which gives it venue over transactions that touch a correspondent account there even when every counterparty is offshore. Its verified complaint of 14 September 2026, signed by the United States Attorney James M. McDonald and four assistant United States attorneys, seeks forfeiture of all USDT in ten Tron addresses holding 61,192,367.59 USDT under 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(A), (C) and (G), on the allegation that the funds are proceeds of black market sales of Iranian crude oil to buyers in China. The pleading rests on a dollar correspondent leg of about $508m and on Tether having already frozen every target address in June and July 2025.

Frameworks and functions

Civil forfeiture in rem
An action against property rather than a person, in which the government must show the property is proceeds or instrumentalities of an offence. No one has to be charged, and the named defendants are the assets themselves.
Correspondent account venue
The basis on which dollar transactions between offshore parties reach a Manhattan court: the wires clear through a bank headquartered in the district, which is where acts giving rise to forfeiture are said to have taken place.

Coverage

Developments in which United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is a named party, newest first.

On the record

Manhattan prosecutors seek forfeiture of $61m of USDT frozen by Tether in 2025

The verified complaint in 26 Civ. 8010 names ten Tron addresses holding 61,192,367.59 USDT as the proceeds of Iranian oil sold to Chinese buyers. Its own table dates the issuer's freezes to 15 June and 26 July 2025, and it describes about $508m of the same trade clearing through a New York correspondent account.

The weekly read on onchain market economics

What issued, what settled, what the supervisors changed, with the numbers behind it and a note on what the numbers do not show. One email, Thursday mornings.

Unsubscribe in one click.