Nathan Schneider has recently released an article describing his perspectives on cryptoeconomics, and particularly on the limits of cryptoeconomic approaches to governance and what cryptoeconomics could be augmented with to improve its usefulness. This is, of course, a topic that is dear to me ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5]), so it is heartening to see someone else take the blockchain space seriously as an intellectual tradition and engage with the issues from a different and unique perspective.
Related Posts
BREAKDOWN: Can Crypto Create Cultural Revolutions?
A reading of David Hoffman’s recent essay “The Digital Cultural Revolution.” (See below) The Digital Culture Revolution Ethereum,…
Retroactive Public Goods Funding
It’s insanely hard to build an ambitious project with no business model. It’s hard to get funding, to…
The Store of Value Generation is Kicking Your Ass and You Don’t Even Know it
What is something worth? A building, a pen, a stock, a cryptocurrency, gold, Intellectual property, any asset? Valuing…
Too Much, Too Soon, Too Fast
Some things scale well. Double their size and you get double the output (or more). Other things don’t,…